Updated
Updated · Breaking Defense · Jul 23
Steven Wills Defends US Navy Hormuz Operations as 0 Combat Losses Undercut 'Failure' Claims
Updated
Updated · Breaking Defense · Jul 23

Steven Wills Defends US Navy Hormuz Operations as 0 Combat Losses Undercut 'Failure' Claims

3 articles · Updated · Breaking Defense · Jul 23

Summary

  • Steven Wills argued the US Navy cannot be labeled a failure in the Strait of Hormuz while operations continue and no US ship or carrier-based aircraft has been lost in combat.
  • The rebuttal answers a July 17 critique by CSIS analyst Mark Cancian, who said the Navy failed to plan adequately for keeping the strait open despite years of warning.
  • Wills said blockade enforcement, escort missions, mine countermeasures and counter-drone combat have worked, while Iranian small-boat attacks were repeatedly repelled and shipping still moves along US-guided southern routes.
  • He added that Hormuz has been threatened, not truly closed: no confirmed ship has struck a mine, AEGIS warships and helicopters have blunted attacks, and large-scale mine clearance is typically judged after combat ends.
  • The broader point, he wrote, is that any shortfall in Operation Epic Fury would be political or joint-force strategic failure rather than proof of a naval defeat.

Insights

Has the U.S. Navy really succeeded in Hormuz, or only prevented a total closure while the wider campaign remains unresolved?
If no U.S. warship has been lost, why are shippers still avoiding Hormuz and insurers keeping premiums high?