Gorsuch says Supreme Court divides reflect legal interpretation, not politics

8 articles · Updated · Fox News · May 8

In a Fox News Digital interview, the justice said textualist and originalist methods shape disagreements among colleagues and their rulings, while debate inside the court remains respectful.
He said justices are trying to reach the right legal answer, and that disagreement is expected and healthy rather than personal.
The remarks come amid heightened scrutiny of the judiciary and after Donald Trump criticised the court's conservative majority over blocked tariffs and possible action on his birthright citizenship order.

With the court curbing presidential tariff power, which other executive authorities might be challenged next?

As states increasingly reject federal precedents, are we moving toward fifty different versions of fundamental rights?

If legal methods are neutral, why do studies suggest they fail to constrain judges' personal views?