Lucky Strike Entertainment faces class action over alleged bowling monopoly
Updated
Updated · Bloomberg Law · May 8
Lucky Strike Entertainment faces class action over alleged bowling monopoly
9 articles · Updated · Bloomberg Law · May 8
The proposed consumer suit, filed in federal court in western Washington, says the company grew from six US centres in 2012 to nearly 350 by 2026.
Plaintiffs say acquisitions including AMF Bowling Centers, Brunswick and the Professional Bowlers Association let Lucky Strike raise league and food prices, cut quality and pressure suppliers for favourable terms.
The case seeks relief under the Clayton and Sherman acts and could unwind past deals; Lucky Strike, backed by Atairos, called the lawsuit meritless.
With Ticketmaster found to be a monopoly, is the bowling industry the next to face a major antitrust showdown?
Has private equity's buyout of local alleys turned bowling from an affordable pastime into an overpriced experience?