Supreme Court rejects bid to undo immediate Louisiana redistricting judgment
Updated
Updated · SCOTUSblog · May 6
Supreme Court rejects bid to undo immediate Louisiana redistricting judgment
11 articles · Updated · SCOTUSblog · May 6
The unsigned Wednesday order leaves intact Monday’s move to fast-track the April 29, 6-3 ruling striking down Louisiana’s 2024 congressional map before the 2026 elections.
Black voters said they did intend to seek reconsideration, but the court gave no reasons. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson had dissented from the expedited finalisation, accusing the court of fuelling chaos.
Louisiana plans hearings on a new map with one majority-Black district after postponing its May 16 congressional primary. The state’s six-seat House delegation is now 4-2 Republican, and a redraw could aid Republicans.
What does the future hold for the Voting Rights Act after the Supreme Court’s landmark Louisiana ruling?
What do emergency rulings on election maps signal about the court's role in the electoral process?
Supreme Court's 2026 Ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: The End of Section 2 Voting Rights Protections and Its Impact on Minority Representation
Overview
In April 2026, the Supreme Court struck down Louisiana's congressional map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, setting a new legal standard that requires proving intentional discrimination under the Voting Rights Act. This ruling forced Louisiana to redraw its districts, reducing majority-Black representation and shifting political power toward Republicans. Following the decision, several Southern states quickly revised their maps to weaken minority voting strength, gaining partisan advantages ahead of the 2026 midterms. Civil rights groups condemned the ruling as a major setback, warning it threatens minority representation, fuels political polarization, and undermines multiracial democracy, while also mobilizing legal and grassroots efforts to protect voting rights amid limited federal options.