James Comey prosecution is a travesty, article argues

8 articles · Updated · The Bulwark · May 4

The commentary says Comey is both legally and morally innocent, rejecting defences based on whataboutism, joking, metaphorical violence or the First Amendment.
It frames the case as wrongful on first principles rather than merely politically comparable to Republicans’ rhetoric about Democrats or legally excusable as protected speech.
No previous related reports were provided, so the summary reflects only this latest article’s argument and not any independent legal filing, court action or official response.

What precedent could this case set for the future of protected political speech online?

When does ambiguous online slang cross the legal line to become a criminal threat?