Ohio court denies motion to dismiss employment claims
Updated
Updated · Bloomberg Law · May 4
Ohio court denies motion to dismiss employment claims
2 articles · Updated · Bloomberg Law · May 4
Summary
The ruling lets a chief operating officer’s claims against Charles E. Boyk Law Offices proceed after he was allegedly fired for taking excessive time off.
The court said factual questions remain over whether pre-scheduled vacations were exempted from the parties’ at-will employment arrangement.
The surviving claims include breach of contract, wrongful termination and detrimental reliance, allowing the dispute to move forward in Ohio.