Kaplan and Riley propose flicker method to reverse aging

1 articles · Updated · Fox News · May 3

In their new book, the authors describe seven aging stages and say people can "flicker back" to a younger functional age through exercise, mindset and social connection.
They argue chronological age differs from a lived or "feels-like" age, and that stress or health setbacks can push people older temporarily without making decline permanent.
The pair also challenge age 65 as a biological turning point, urging people to focus on "aging on pace" rather than decline or conventional retirement expectations.

Could new breakthroughs in cellular reprogramming and mindset really allow us to reverse aspects of aging, or is this just wishful thinking?

With criticisms of Blue Zones and risks in rejuvenation science, what truly determines who gets to age with vitality and opportunity?

How do social and economic barriers affect who can benefit from the 'flicker' effect and new anti-aging interventions?