Black, blue and gold versions are priced at $17, while the Deep Black model costs $26.
The watch offers Bluetooth calling, app notifications, a two-inch HD touchscreen, fitness and sleep tracking, and compatibility with iOS and Android phones.
Amazon says the device supports more than 100 activity modes and up to seven days of daily battery life, while the product has received more than 600 five-star ratings.
Can a $17 smartwatch like the Pjyubvor really match the accuracy and reliability of premium brands, or is there a hidden trade-off?
As budget smartwatches proliferate, how can consumers know which health data is genuinely reliable for monitoring their well-being?
With the rapid drop in smartwatch prices, are we heading toward an e-waste crisis or a new era of truly accessible digital health?