The owner claims Google sought $287.44 for screen, frame, and camera damage after a warranty repair for eSIM issues.
Despite Google’s claim, the device was returned without any external damage, and no repairs were performed as the owner refused the charge.
The owner has filed complaints with their state’s Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs and the California BBB, highlighting ongoing customer service concerns with Google’s repair process.
Are Google's damage claims for warranty repairs a deliberate profit strategy?
As legal protections weaken, what is Google's real financial risk from repair lawsuits?
Your phone needs a warranty repair. How do you prove it was not already damaged?
What hidden fees and 'parts pairing' tactics inflate your phone repair bill?
Will new 'Right to Repair' laws stop tech giants from blocking independent repairs?