Zine creators debate and resist artificial intelligence in handmade publishing

7 articles · Updated · The Guardian · Apr 28

Artists like Rachel Goldfinger in Philadelphia and Maddie Marshall in Melbourne have published anti-AI zines, while others experiment with AI tools for online-only zines and layout design.
Some zinemakers argue AI undermines the handmade, grassroots ethos of zines, prompting protests and the use of AI checkers in publications like Polyester. Others see AI as a democratizing tool for creators lacking technical skills.
The debate highlights a generational and philosophical divide, with some embracing AI for efficiency and accessibility, while many traditionalists insist zine culture’s value lies in its slow, personal, and tactile creation process.

Could AI actually empower more marginalized voices, fulfilling the original promise of zines?

Will rising costs force print creators to embrace the efficiency of AI?

Can the 'scrappy ethos' of zine culture survive in a world of polished AI art?

As AI blurs creator lines, who truly owns an AI-assisted piece of art?

Beyond zines, is a 'Luddite Renaissance' the only way to save human artistry?