Missouri town voters oust four council members over $6 billion data center approval
Updated
Updated · POLITICO · Apr 26
Missouri town voters oust four council members over $6 billion data center approval
9 articles · Updated · POLITICO · Apr 26
The ousted officials had approved a $6 billion data center, reflecting growing local backlash against large-scale tech developments.
Similar opposition has emerged nationwide, with Maine passing a temporary data center ban and other cities rejecting projects amid concerns about energy use and community impact.
In Georgia, efforts to pause data center construction or suspend tax breaks have failed, while residents and lawmakers debate how to address voter concerns as the issue gains prominence ahead of elections.
Beyond tax breaks, what are the true economic benefits data centers offer local towns?
Could slowing data center growth threaten America's lead in the global AI race?
As AI data centers create 'heat islands,' what long-term ecological changes could communities face?
How much are hidden data center subsidies and grid costs adding to your utility bill?
Can small nuclear reactors solve the AI energy crisis without facing the same local opposition?
Will 'bring your own power' models for tech giants create a two-tiered, private energy grid?
Festus Votes Out Incumbents Over $6 Billion Data Center Controversy Amid Environmental and Legal Battles
Overview
In Festus, Missouri, the controversial $6 billion CRG Clayco data center project sparked intense community opposition due to rushed approvals, secrecy, and environmental concerns, especially about water use and land impact. This led to the April 2026 election ousting four incumbent council members who supported the project, replaced by officials pledging transparency and to halt the development. Residents and advocacy groups filed a lawsuit challenging the rezoning, development agreement, and alleged violations of open records laws. Fears over aquifer depletion, thermal pollution, and dismissive officials fueled distrust, overshadowing the developer's promises of jobs and tax revenue, highlighting a broader national backlash against data center expansions.