Maryland became the third state to enact such legislation on April 9, requiring judges to apply a factual test before admitting artistic works, including rap lyrics, as evidence.
The law aims to address concerns that prosecutors disproportionately use rap lyrics to target young men of color, potentially introducing racial bias into trials and sentencing decisions.
Over the past five years, at least 27 similar bills have been introduced across the US, reflecting growing scrutiny of how creative expression is used in criminal proceedings and calls for clearer judicial guidelines.
Will new state laws protecting artists' lyrics impact this death penalty case?
Are rap lyrics protected artistic expression or a confession that is admissible in court?
Did a spreadsheet targeting Black jurors illegally lead to a death sentence in Texas?
With new DNA evidence and a confession, what does justice look like for the victims?
His cousin confessed to the murders, so why is James Broadnax days from execution?
Maryland's PACE Act Sets New Legal Standard to Protect Artists from Misuse of Creative Expression in Criminal Trials
Overview
Maryland's PACE Act, passed in April 2026 and effective October 1, 2026, sets strict limits on using artists' creative works, like rap lyrics, as evidence in criminal trials. It requires prosecutors to prove that the work was intended literally, directly relevant to disputed facts, and that its value outweighs potential prejudice. This law responds to widespread concerns about racial bias, highlighted by high-profile cases where rap lyrics were misused against Black artists. Supported by strong advocacy from music industry leaders and civil rights groups, Maryland's law aligns with California's robust model and aims to protect artistic freedom while promoting fairer trials. It also inspires similar efforts nationwide.