Supreme Court to decide if Monsanto can be sued over Roundup cancer warnings

5 articles · Updated · USA TODAY · Apr 25

John Durnell, awarded $1.25 million after developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, is at the center of the case to be argued April 27.
Monsanto faces billions in potential liability, while a proposed $7.25 billion class action settlement could resolve many lawsuits regardless of the Supreme Court's decision.
The EPA has never required a cancer warning for glyphosate, but conflicting scientific reviews and regulatory delays have fueled legal battles and uncertainty for Roundup users and U.S. agriculture.

If Roundup is restricted, what does it mean for the future of American farming and our food supply?

With conflicting scientific reports on Roundup, how can anyone truly know if it's safe?

Why was a key scientific study on Roundup's safety retracted after decades of use by regulators?

If federal regulators say a product is safe, can a company still be sued for not warning of cancer risks?

Should a jury's verdict on science outweigh a federal agency's expert conclusion?