Updated
Updated · The Verge · Jul 21
Substack Launches 100-Word AI Detector as Platform Targets 'Claudefishing'
Updated
Updated · The Verge · Jul 21

Substack Launches 100-Word AI Detector as Platform Targets 'Claudefishing'

3 articles · Updated · The Verge · Jul 21

Summary

  • Substack on Tuesday began rolling out an AI detector that lets readers scan posts, notes, replies and comments to estimate whether text was AI-generated or AI-assisted.
  • Content longer than 100 words can be checked through a “Scan for AI text” option, with the Pangram-powered feature arriving on the web and iOS first and Android coming soon.
  • Chris Best said the tool is meant to curb “Claudefishing” — content that appears human-written but lacks human authorship — because that mismatch can erode reader trust and writers’ livelihoods.
  • Substack is pairing the detector with a new “How I make this” disclosure for creators, while also letting writers scan drafts and report inaccurate results.
  • Best said Pangram can detect AI use in text but not the level of human care behind it, underscoring Substack’s broader push for transparency rather than a ban on AI-assisted writing.

Insights

With new laws looming, is Substack’s AI scanner a real trust-builder or just a temporary fix?
As AI detectors police platforms, could writers face a new 'cancel culture' for their style?