Embolo Sees 2nd Yellow for Simulation as VAR Overturns Paredes Booking in 1-1 Quarterfinal

Q: How did a new VAR rule for 2026 lead to the World Cup's first 'mistaken identity' red card?

It happened because the 2026 World Cup expanded VAR’s powers to review incidents involving a potential second yellow card, and that review exposed a case of the referee initially punishing the wrong player. In Switzerland’s quarterfinal against Argentina, referee Joao Pedro Silva Pinheiro first booked Argentina’s Leandro Paredes for a foul on Breel Embolo. Under the new 2026 VAR protocol, officials were allowed to intervene because the incident could lead to a second-yellow situation and because “mistaken identity” is reviewable when the wrong player is sanctioned. After reviewing the footage, VAR concluded Paredes had not fouled Embolo and that Embolo had simulated contact. Pinheiro then went to the monitor, withdrew Paredes’s yellow card, and instead cautioned Embolo for diving. Because Embolo had already been booked earlier, that new caution became his second yellow and automatically a red card. That is why the dismissal was described as the tournament’s first “mistaken identity” red card: the red did not come from a direct sending-off offense, but from VAR correcting the referee’s original identification of the offender and reassigning the yellow card to the player who had actually committed the offense. Most rules analysts said the decision was harsh in effect but correct under the updated VAR framework.

Q: How can a player who is initially awarded a foul end up being sent off for the same incident?

A player can be sent off after initially being awarded a foul if VAR shows the referee got the incident wrong and the “fouled” player actually committed simulation or another bookable offense. That is what happened with Switzerland’s Breel Embolo. On the field, the referee believed Argentina’s Leandro Paredes had fouled him and showed Paredes a yellow card. But VAR reviewed the challenge and judged that Embolo had simulated the contact rather than been fouled. After watching the replay, the referee reversed his original call, cancelled Paredes’s yellow card, and instead booked Embolo for diving. Because Embolo had already been cautioned earlier in the match, that new yellow card became his second yellow, which automatically meant a red card and dismissal. The key legal mechanism is VAR’s power to correct clear errors in reviewable situations, including mistaken identity and, at this World Cup, second-yellow-card incidents. The referee remains the final decision-maker, but once video evidence shows the original foul call was wrong, he can fully overturn it: remove the foul, cancel the opponent’s card, and punish the player who tried to deceive him. So the same incident can move from “foul won” to “simulation punished” if replay evidence shows the player was not the victim but the offender.

3 articles · Updated · USA TODAY · Jul 12

Breel Embolo was sent off in the second half after VAR ruled he had dived against Leandro Paredes, turning an initial caution for the Argentina midfielder into the Swiss forward’s second yellow.
Video review found Paredes had not touched Embolo, prompting the officials to punish simulation — soccer’s term for trying to draw a foul by falling deliberately.
The dismissal came minutes after Dan Ndoye had leveled the World Cup quarterfinal for Switzerland, leaving the match tied 1-1 as the Swiss were reduced to 10 men.
That red card was later identified as the first use of the tournament’s new mistaken-identity rule, and Switzerland eventually lost 3-1 to Argentina in extra time.