Updated
Updated · ZDNet · Jul 10
Google Fitbit Air Tracks Heart Rate Within 2.5% but Misses Calories by Up to 31%
Updated
Updated · ZDNet · Jul 10

Google Fitbit Air Tracks Heart Rate Within 2.5% but Misses Calories by Up to 31%

3 articles · Updated · ZDNet · Jul 10

Summary

  • ZDNET’s gym test found Fitbit Air’s average and minimum heart-rate readings stayed close to a Polar H10 chest strap, with treadmill heart-rate error under 2.5%.
  • During pace changes and strength intervals, the wrist-worn device lagged or missed brief spikes: it logged 109 bpm when Polar showed 141, and strength-session max heart rate was 134 versus 151.
  • Calorie estimates diverged more sharply, with Fitbit Air undercounting treadmill burn by 17 kcal, or 11.9%, and strength training by 47 kcal, or 30.9%.
  • The test suggests Fitbit Air is reliable for general heart-rate tracking but weaker for calorie counting and short-burst intensity work, where chest straps remain the better option.

Insights

How can budget trackers compete when premium rivals like Apple and Garmin offer demonstrably superior heart rate accuracy?
With calorie tracking off by 30%, can wrist-worn fitness trackers ever be trusted for serious diet and weight management goals?
Is Google prioritizing its Gemini AI coach over improving sensor accuracy in its affordable fitness trackers like the Fitbit Air?