Apple TV Labels $25 Obsession Unrated as Viewers Find No Difference From R Cut

Q: Is the rumored graphic cut of 'Obsession' a myth, or will the studio eventually release the more violent version?

The graphic cut of *Obsession* is real, but there is no confirmed release plan for it. What is clear is that director Curry Barker has said a more violent version existed before the film was trimmed to secure an R rating. He described extra blows in the key face-smashing scene, and reports indicate that a harsher cut played at Toronto. Barker has also said he would like to assemble a fuller director’s cut, potentially restoring that violence and an alternate ending. What is not clear is whether Blumhouse or Focus will actually release it. The recent streaming confusion does not count as evidence. Apple TV briefly labeled the film “unrated,” but viewers comparing it with Amazon’s R-rated version found no meaningful differences: the runtime matched, the controversial scene appeared the same, and Apple later corrected the listing back to “R.” That strongly suggests the “unrated” tag was a metadata error, not a stealth release of the festival cut. There is also no sign, so far, that the upcoming July 14 physical release includes an alternate or unrated version. Announced extras mention featurettes and commentary, not a new cut. So the best reading is this: the rumored violent cut is not a myth, but it remains unreleased. Unless the studio formally announces a director’s cut or unrated edition, viewers should assume the currently available digital version is just the standard R-rated film.

1 articles · Updated · Forbes · Jun 30

$25 purchases of Obsession on Apple TV are tagged “unrated,” but viewers comparing the release with the theatrical version report the same runtime and no confirmed content changes.
The confusion centers on a brutal Sarah attack scene that was previously said to be trimmed for an R rating; the Apple TV version appears to show the same number of blows and no clearly restored footage.
Amazon Prime Video lists the film as the standard R-rated release, while Apple TV offers only the supposedly unrated edition, an unusual split that has fueled suspicion of a labeling or distribution mix-up.
For now, the platform choice appears not to affect what audiences actually see, leaving the “unrated” tag looking more like a metadata error than a distinct cut.

Sources

Forbes5d ago

Apple TV's "Unrated" 'Obsession' Cut Confuses Viewers, Appears Identical to R-Rated Theatrical Version

Was 'Obsession's' rating mix-up a simple mistake, or does it expose a larger data problem for streaming platforms?

Is the rumored graphic cut of 'Obsession' a myth, or will the studio eventually release the more violent version?

Sources

1 total

Forbes5d ago

Apple TV's "Unrated" 'Obsession' Cut Confuses Viewers, Appears Identical to R-Rated Theatrical Version

Apple TV Labels $25 Obsession Unrated as Viewers Find No Difference From R Cut

Summary

Sources

Insights

Sources