Updated
Updated · POLITICO · Jul 2
Supreme Court Lets $800-a-Day Fine Hit Catherine Herridge in Source Disclosure Fight
Updated
Updated · POLITICO · Jul 2

Supreme Court Lets $800-a-Day Fine Hit Catherine Herridge in Source Disclosure Fight

3 articles · Updated · POLITICO · Jul 2

Summary

  • The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to block sanctions against Catherine Herridge, allowing an $800-a-day contempt fine to take effect over her refusal to identify a confidential source.
  • The dispute stems from Yanping Chen’s 2018 Privacy Act lawsuit alleging U.S. officials leaked details of an FBI investigation into her and her Virginia school to Herridge.
  • A federal judge in 2023 ordered Herridge to reveal her source, rejected her First Amendment arguments and held her in contempt; an appeals court later upheld that ruling.
  • Herridge can still ask the justices to review the underlying source-disclosure orders, but fines are expected to keep accruing and could be increased, with jail also possible as a coercive step.
  • Fox News called the decision a blow to source confidentiality and press freedom, while former Solicitor General Paul Clement’s recent entry signals the fight is likely to continue.

Insights

Whose rights matter more: a journalist protecting a source, or a citizen unmasking a leaker who ruined their life?
If courts won't protect sources, can technology offer whistleblowers the anonymity that journalists no longer can?