Updated
Updated · IAI · Jun 29
Brian Kierland Argues 1969 Thought Experiment Shows Time Can Pass Without Physical Change
Updated
Updated · IAI · Jun 29

Brian Kierland Argues 1969 Thought Experiment Shows Time Can Pass Without Physical Change

2 articles · Updated · IAI · Jun 29

Summary

  • Brian Kierland says time may pass even when the physical world undergoes no change, challenging a view many physicists tie to Einstein-inspired block-universe thinking.
  • A 1969 thought experiment by philosopher Sydney Shoemaker anchors his case: it aims to show there could, in principle, be empirical evidence that a stretch of time elapsed without any change.
  • That matters because direct timekeeping always relies on change—from sundials and clock hands to cesium-133 atomic transitions—making the idea of changeless time seem counterintuitive.
  • The argument reaches beyond metaphysics into physics, where identifying time with change supports relationist views, some block-universe interpretations and Julian Barbour’s time-skeptical approach to quantum mechanics.
  • Kierland’s conclusion is narrower than proving time is independent of change: he argues the growing push to eliminate time from fundamental physics deserves more skepticism.

Insights

If physics proves time is an illusion, what creates our universal and persistent experience of its flow?
Can we ever scientifically prove time passed if nothing in the universe changed, or is it an untestable idea?
Does a 'block universe' mean the future is already written, making free will just a stubborn illusion?