Republicans Push Courts to Recast 90-Day Ban on Voter Roll Purges
Updated
Updated · NPR · Jul 1
Republicans Push Courts to Recast 90-Day Ban on Voter Roll Purges
3 articles · Updated · NPR · Jul 1
Summary
A federal rule bars most states from systematically removing voters from registration rolls within 90 days of a federal election, and Republicans are now asking courts to narrow that protection.
The push centers on reinterpreting longstanding election law so states could carry out more late-stage voter list maintenance closer to Election Day.
Any court-backed shift could reshape how aggressively states clean voter rolls in the final three months before federal contests, with direct implications for eligible voters' registration status.
With a 90-day ban on voter purges under review, how might last-minute roll cleaning impact future elections?
As federal agencies use new technology for voter purges, what happens when an eligible citizen is flagged by mistake?
What are the privacy risks of a national voter database compiled from state registration files?
Supreme Court’s 2026-2027 Ruling on Arizona’s Voter Purge Laws: National Implications for the NVRA, 90-Day Ban, and 2028 Elections
Overview
The Supreme Court is set to rule on Arizona’s 2022 voter purge laws, which require documentary proof of citizenship for state voter registration. These laws, passed by the Republican-controlled legislature after unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud in 2020, have been challenged by voting rights groups who argue they unfairly target minority and student voters. While a 2013 Supreme Court decision said states cannot require such proof for federal registrations, Arizona’s law creates a separate 'federal-only' voter category. The upcoming decision could reshape national voting rights by either upholding or weakening protections under the National Voter Registration Act.