Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Jun 29
Supreme Court Rejects Roy Moore Bid to Restore $8.2 Million Verdict
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Jun 29

Supreme Court Rejects Roy Moore Bid to Restore $8.2 Million Verdict

1 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Jun 29

Summary

  • An emergency request from Roy Moore was denied Monday, leaving him unable for now to collect an $8.2 million defamation award tied to a 2017 Senate campaign ad.
  • The order kept in place an April 11th Circuit ruling that unanimously erased a jury verdict finding a Democratic group had defamed Moore in a television spot.
  • Clarence Thomas, who handles emergency applications from that region, denied the request without explanation, the usual practice for such orders.
  • Moore’s lawyers said they will still ask the Supreme Court to hear the case on the merits, arguing the ad falsely portrayed him as a predator and that delay could jeopardize any eventual recovery.

Insights

Why can an appeals court simply erase a multi-million dollar jury verdict for defamation?
Is the 60-year-old legal shield protecting speech about public figures now at risk?
How can political ads legally create a false narrative using technically true statements?