Updated
Updated · Bloomberg Law · Jun 26
Federal Court Lets 4 Claims Against MCP Holdings Proceed Over Vested Stock Options
Updated
Updated · Bloomberg Law · Jun 26

Federal Court Lets 4 Claims Against MCP Holdings Proceed Over Vested Stock Options

1 articles · Updated · Bloomberg Law · Jun 26

Summary

  • A federal district court refused to dismiss a former MCP Holdings senior vice president’s lawsuit, allowing four claims to move forward.
  • The court found plausible his allegations that MCP improperly canceled vested stock options and sent defamatory letters to his new employer.
  • The surviving claims include defamation, tortious interference, breach of contract, and violations of the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law.
  • The ruling keeps the dispute alive at an early stage, with the court deciding only that the allegations were sufficiently supported to proceed.

Insights

When does a company's warning about a former employee become a costly defamation and interference lawsuit?
How can vested stock options, once earned, suddenly become the center of a high-stakes legal battle?