Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Jun 25
Louise Perry Reopens Debate on 2020s Sexual Revolution in New York Times Podcast
Updated
Updated · The New York Times · Jun 25

Louise Perry Reopens Debate on 2020s Sexual Revolution in New York Times Podcast

2 articles · Updated · The New York Times · Jun 25

Summary

  • Louise Perry used a New York Times “Interesting Times” episode to argue that the sexual revolution reshaped relations between men and women in ways that ultimately favored men.
  • Ross Douthat framed the discussion around widening alienation between the sexes, calling it a major cultural and political story tied to misogynistic influencers on the right and feminist despair on the left.
  • Perry’s appearance revisits the argument of her book, “The Case Against the Sexual Revolution,” which she wrote in the early 2020s and discussed in an edited transcript published June 25.
  • The episode casts the debate as part of a broader question over whether today’s gender tensions require a new sexual settlement rather than a continuation of the old revolution.

Insights

As female leadership declines, is this the endgame of a sexual revolution that primarily benefited men?
Is the growing alienation between men and women a threat to wider social and economic stability?
If modern gender relations are broken, can corporate incentives succeed where social revolutions have failed?