3 articles · Updated · The Washington Post · Jun 25
Summary
Two ideologically split Supreme Court rulings on Thursday handed Donald Trump major immigration wins, allowing his administration to deport some migrants who had been living in the U.S. lawfully and to restart a border policy blocking asylum seekers.
The decisions could affect millions of immigrants by expanding the administration’s power both inside the country and at the border, sharply advancing Trump’s push to curb immigration.
Earlier reports said the court’s conservative majority ruled 6-3 in related cases, including one stripping protections from 356,000 immigrants and another holding that asylum seekers outside the U.S. are not legally "present."
Taken together, the rulings restore broad federal authority over deportations and asylum access, setting up sweeping changes in who can remain in the United States or seek entry.
Does the Supreme Court's redefinition of 'arriving' alter America's fundamental asylum obligations?
With metering approved and work permits restricted, what future awaits asylum seekers at the border?
How will metering's return impact the massive asylum backlog and wait times for applicants?
Supreme Court Affirms Federal Authority to Block Asylum Seekers at Border: Implications of the 2026 Mullin v. Al Otro Lado Decision
Overview
On June 25, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a pivotal 6-3 decision in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, affirming the federal government’s authority to turn back asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border before they physically enter the United States. This ruling clarifies the scope of executive power over border management and asylum processing, restoring the government’s discretion to control the flow of individuals seeking asylum. The decision marks a significant shift in immigration policy, setting a legal precedent that empowers the executive branch and is expected to spark renewed debate and legislative challenges regarding the treatment of asylum seekers at the border.