15 Basketball Players Sue NCAA Over 5th Season Ban Under New Eligibility Model

Q: Why is the NCAA's new five-year rule excluding one specific class of senior athletes?

The NCAA’s new five-year rule excludes this class of senior athletes because the policy is being applied prospectively, not retroactively. Under the new “five-for-five” or age-based model, athletes can compete for five seasons within a five-year window, but the NCAA drew a cutoff: players who had already completed their fourth season by spring 2026 do not get an extra year. That mainly affects current seniors from the high school class of 2022 who used four seasons without redshirting. By contrast, athletes who still have eligibility left after the 2025-26 academic year, along with some incoming 2026-27 enrollees and future recruits, can benefit from the new framework or choose whichever system is more favorable. The NCAA’s aim is to simplify eligibility rules going forward and reduce waivers and litigation, but the transition line leaves one narrow cohort outside the change. That is why the plaintiffs say they were singled out. Their argument is that older athletes before them received COVID-era eligibility relief, and younger athletes after them will benefit from the new five-year model, while their class alone is denied both. In practical terms, they say the rule shuts them out of another season just as schools can now offer scholarship, revenue-sharing and NIL opportunities that were not available to the same extent earlier in their careers.

3 articles · Updated · Front Office Sports · Jun 24

Fifteen men’s and women’s basketball players sued the NCAA in Ohio on Wednesday, seeking an emergency order to let them play in 2026-27 despite being excluded from the new eligibility system.
The rule, approved less than 24 hours earlier, gives athletes five years to play as many seasons as possible starting at college enrollment or age 19, but bars players who already completed 4 seasons.
The plaintiffs — all 2022 high school graduates who used four NCAA seasons by this past year — argue that exclusion unfairly cuts short their five-year window and limits scholarship and NIL earning opportunities.
Their complaint does not attack NCAA eligibility rules broadly; it says the NCAA’s application of the bylaw breaches obligations to athletes as third-party beneficiaries of contracts with member schools.
Lawyers Darren Heitner and Ryan Downton said they have lined up more than 50 basketball players and plan additional lawsuits in multiple states this week, making this the first challenge to the NCAA’s new model.

Sources

Front Office Sports4h ago

Basketball Players Sue NCAA Over New Eligibility Model Denying Fifth Season

Yahoo Sports8h ago

Potential Cincinnati Bearcats Basketball Transfer Additions File Lawsuit to Play One More Season - Yahoo Sports

Sports Illustrated7h ago

Potential Cincinnati Bearcats Basketball Transfer Additions File Lawsuit to Play One More Season

6 Sources

Why is the NCAA's new five-year rule excluding one specific class of senior athletes?

As athletes sue for more playing years, is the NCAA's amateur model officially dead?

NCAA Faces Legal Crisis: 15 Division I Athletes Sue Over 2026 Eligibility Rule Excluding Class of 2022

Overview

In June 2026, 15 Division I basketball players sued the NCAA over its new age-based eligibility model, which excludes the high school class of 2022 from receiving an extra season of competition. The athletes argue this exclusion is unfair and a breach of contract, especially since similar waivers were granted during the pandemic. Their lawsuit seeks an injunction to let them play in the 2026-27 season, prevent penalties for schools that sign them, and allow transfers without using the portal. This legal challenge highlights growing disputes over NCAA rules and the urgent impact on athletes’ careers and opportunities.

...