Updated
Updated · Fox News · Jun 19
Becky Hill Seeks Dismissal of Alex Murdaugh's $600,000 Suit as Immunity Defense Takes Center Stage
Updated
Updated · Fox News · Jun 19

Becky Hill Seeks Dismissal of Alex Murdaugh's $600,000 Suit as Immunity Defense Takes Center Stage

3 articles · Updated · Fox News · Jun 19

Summary

  • Thursday's filing asks a federal judge to throw out Alex Murdaugh's lawsuit seeking $600,000 for legal fees from his 2023 murder trial after his convictions were overturned.
  • Hill argues Murdaugh has no legal right to recover defense costs because he would have paid those attorneys regardless, and says a new trial—not damages—is the proper remedy for jury tampering.
  • Her motion also invokes Eleventh Amendment, quasi-judicial and qualified immunity, while challenging causation and standing by arguing prosecutors—not Hill—forced Murdaugh to stand trial.
  • The dispute follows the South Carolina Supreme Court's May decision vacating Murdaugh's murder convictions over Hill's jury influence; Hill later pleaded guilty to obstruction, perjury and misconduct charges.
  • Murdaugh remains imprisoned on separate financial-crimes sentences as his lawyers prepare for a possible retrial, with a federal judge now set to decide whether the civil case can proceed.

Insights

Could Murdaugh's lawsuit against Becky Hill set a precedent for defendants seeking damages after unfair trials caused by court officials?
If Murdaugh faces a retrial, will the exclusion of extensive financial crime evidence change the outcome, and what new evidence might emerge?
With Hill admitting she influenced the jury for book sales, how can courts ensure future juries remain impartial in high-profile cases?