Updated
Updated · The Washington Post · Jun 16
Antimicrobial Soaps Match Plain Soap, May Fuel 1 in 6 Drug-Resistant Infections
Updated
Updated · The Washington Post · Jun 16

Antimicrobial Soaps Match Plain Soap, May Fuel 1 in 6 Drug-Resistant Infections

1 articles · Updated · The Washington Post · Jun 16

Summary

  • Decades of studies found antimicrobial soaps do not reduce household illness better than plain soap and water, even though they are marketed to kill 99.9% of germs.
  • A 2007 review of 27 studies found triclosan was no more effective than plain soap, while lab evidence showed triclosan-resistant bacteria can also become more resistant to antibiotics.
  • The FDA banned 19 antiseptic wash ingredients in 2016, including triclosan, but left benzalkonium chloride, benzethonium chloride and chloroxylenol in extended regulatory deferrals that have stretched for a decade.
  • WHO says 1 in 6 common bacterial infections now resist standard antibiotics—up 40% from 2018 to 2023—and resistant infections caused about 1 million deaths a year from 1990 to 2021.
  • Public health guidance still favors plain soap and water for routine cleaning, reserving EPA-registered disinfectants or diluted bleach for high-risk contamination such as bodily fluids, raw meat or stomach bugs.

Insights

Beyond superbugs, what other health risks are hiding in the sanitizers you use every day?
Is your 'germ-killing' soap fueling a superbug crisis projected to be deadlier than cancer?
Regulators banned 19 soap chemicals a decade ago. Why are similar risky ones still being sold?