London Property Event Advertised West Bank Settlement Homes Despite Organizers' Green Line Denial
Updated
Updated · Middle East Eye · Jun 15
London Property Event Advertised West Bank Settlement Homes Despite Organizers' Green Line Denial
3 articles · Updated · Middle East Eye · Jun 15
Summary
Photos and brochures from Sunday’s Great Israeli Real Estate Event in London showed homes marketed in East Jerusalem and West Bank settlements, according to a Middle East Eye investigation.
Jerusalem Real Estate promoted projects in French Hill and Ramat Eshkol; Harey Zahav advertised Kfar Eldad and Teneh Omarim; Tivuch Shelly marketed Ma'ale Adunim as an "exciting new project just 10 minutes from Jerusalem."
Those findings directly contradicted organizers’ statement last week that all exhibitors would present properties only within the Green Line and not in the occupied West Bank.
The event drew protests outside Edgware United Synagogue, where activists said pro-Israel counter-protesters threatened demonstrators and some Palestinian activists were arrested.
Pressure had already been building: more than 100 MPs urged the event’s cancellation, the UK government warned businesses against activity in illegal settlements, and Mayor Sadiq Khan said the Met would assess any criminal allegations.
Can legal action against a London synagogue block sales of occupied land when UK policy has failed?
Why can UN-listed firms sell property from illegal settlements in London despite UK government opposition?
The Great Israeli Real Estate Event in London (2026): Settlement Promotion, Public Outcry, and Legal Implications
Overview
In June 2026, the 'Great Israeli Real Estate Event' at Edgware United Synagogue in north London sparked intense controversy and public outcry. Allegations that the event promoted properties in Israeli settlements led to strong opposition from political figures and community groups, who argued these settlements were built on Palestinian land and fueled further expansion. Calls for the event’s cancellation grew, with leaders urging police intervention. The dispute highlighted deep divisions over the legality and ethics of such activities, resulting in protests, arrests, and renewed debate about the UK’s stance on international law and community safety.