Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Jun 5
Margaret Hodge Blasts NAO Over 3 Andrew Cottages as Royal Property Scrutiny Widens
Updated
Updated · The Guardian · Jun 5

Margaret Hodge Blasts NAO Over 3 Andrew Cottages as Royal Property Scrutiny Widens

3 articles · Updated · The Guardian · Jun 5

Summary

  • Margaret Hodge said it was “shocking” the National Audit Office could not determine how much Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor earned from subletting three cottages on the Windsor Royal Lodge estate.
  • The criticism followed an NAO report showing Andrew received private income from those lets while paying a “peppercorn rent” to the Crown Estate, and Hodge said the review also failed to cover all relevant royal properties.
  • Hodge also questioned taxpayer-backed housing for non-working royals, citing Beatrice, Eugenie and the Kents, and asked whether such subsidies were appropriate.
  • The report said King Charles pays below-market adjusted rent from the Duchy of Lancaster for Beatrice and Eugenie’s homes, while the Waleses’ Windsor home had £400,000 of Crown Estate repairs before they took a 20-year lease at £307,200 a year.
  • The findings will underpin a Commons public accounts committee inquiry launched after last year’s outcry over Andrew’s rent deal, with both the Crown Estate and Buckingham Palace saying the arrangements were transparent and professionally valued.

Insights

Beyond Andrew, how many other royals are profiting from secret, below-market deals on public property?
If the Crown Estate must seek the best price, why do royals get taxpayer-subsidised rent deals?
With Prince William modernizing his estate, will King Charles end secretive property perks for non-working royals?