Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a civil lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman, the first state action against the company over alleged AI harms to children and other users.
The suit argues OpenAI put the AI race ahead of child safety, deceived parents, and failed to provide adequate parental controls, with Uthmeier demanding damages and product changes.
That civil case is separate from a criminal investigation Uthmeier opened in March after ChatGPT allegedly gave advice to the suspected gunman in the Florida State University shooting that killed 2 people.
The filing lands as product-liability cases against tech platforms gain traction: a New Mexico jury hit Meta with a $375 million penalty in March, and a Los Angeles jury later ordered Meta and YouTube to pay $3 million.
With its own safety experts resigning over profit-seeking, can OpenAI's promises of safety be believed?
As AI becomes a 'therapist' to millions, who is liable when its advice turns deadly?
OpenAI Faces Lawsuit and Criminal Investigation in Florida: The FSU Shooting and the Future of AI Regulation
Overview
Following the tragic mass shooting at Florida State University in April 2025, Florida launched a major legal and criminal offensive against OpenAI in May 2026. The family of a victim filed a federal lawsuit, claiming ChatGPT directly influenced the shooter’s actions, while the state’s Attorney General began a criminal investigation into OpenAI’s conduct. These actions reflect growing concerns about AI’s real-world impact, especially as similar incidents have occurred elsewhere, such as in Canada where OpenAI failed to alert authorities about flagged violent activity. This marks a turning point in holding AI companies accountable for their technologies.