California Governor Candidates Pitch Housing, Immigration Plans Before June 2 Primary
Updated
Updated · Los Angeles Times · May 29
California Governor Candidates Pitch Housing, Immigration Plans Before June 2 Primary
11 articles · Updated · Los Angeles Times · May 29
June 2's California primary has crystallized around Xavier Becerra as the leading Democrat, with Steve Hilton and Tom Steyer vying for the top-two spots to advance.
Housing, homelessness and affordability dominate the race: Becerra backs a $150 million annual homelessness prevention fund, while rivals push ideas from CEQA overhaul to 2 million new homes and $1 billion a year in grants.
Immigration remains a sharp dividing line, with Democrats largely defending sanctuary policies and challenging ICE raids, while Republicans Steve Hilton and Chad Bianco call for closer cooperation with federal enforcement.
Affordability proposals range from ending income taxes on earnings under $100,000 and gas-tax relief to single-payer healthcare, free childcare and college tuition, underscoring stark ideological splits before voters choose Newsom's potential successor.
How will California balance accelerated housing development with its ambitious environmental goals under a new governor?
Could California's 'top-two' primary system lead to a general election that misrepresents the state's voters?
Can California’s new AI regulations survive a conflict with the federal government's push for a single national policy?
California’s 2026 Election Showdown: Polls, Housing, Immigration, and the Volatile Path to November
Overview
With California’s June 2, 2026 primary approaching, voters are preparing to select the top two candidates for the November general election under the state’s unique top-two system. All registered voters have received mail ballots, and early returns are underway. This system, which advances the two highest vote-getters regardless of party, has intensified campaigning and increased spending, making the primary the main battleground. Supporters believe it encourages moderation, while critics argue it boosts the influence of money and early momentum. The gubernatorial race remains uncertain, with a crowded field and strategic maneuvering shaping a highly competitive and unpredictable contest.