Updated
Updated · spacedaily.com · May 27
Study Says 13% of Earth Could Have Let 10-Km Asteroid Kill Dinosaurs
Updated
Updated · spacedaily.com · May 27

Study Says 13% of Earth Could Have Let 10-Km Asteroid Kill Dinosaurs

1 articles · Updated · spacedaily.com · May 27

Summary

  • A 2017 modeling study by Kunio Kaiho and Naga Oshima argues the Chicxulub asteroid caused mass extinction largely because it hit hydrocarbon-rich, sulphur-bearing seabed rather than most other terrains.
  • Their simulations put only about 13% of late-Cretaceous Earth in that high-risk category, with Chicxulub-like sediments generating enough stratospheric soot to cool the planet by roughly 8-11C and sharply cut rainfall.
  • Most other impact sites in the model produced only mild cooling, implying the asteroid’s location—not just its roughly 10-km size—may have been decisive in ending the dinosaurs’ reign.
  • The claim remains contested because the 13% figure is model-dependent, while other studies emphasize sulphate aerosols, fine silicate dust, or overlapping Deccan Traps volcanism as key drivers of the extinction.
  • A separate 2020 study also suggested Chicxulub was unusually destructive because the asteroid struck at about a 60-degree angle, reinforcing the idea that several features made it a worst-case impact.

Insights

An asteroid may hit the Moon in 2032. Could the debris shower trigger a catastrophic failure of Earth's satellites?
We now track thousands of hazardous asteroids, but are we truly prepared to deflect a surprise planet-killer?
If the dinosaur-killing asteroid had struck the ocean, would a different intelligent species now rule the Earth?