Writer Says AI Stalls at 1st Draft, Citing Calculus Teacher Tears

2 articles · Updated · The Washington Post · May 22

A reader argued AI can only produce a weak “first draft,” contrasting that limit with a human act the writer says a chatbot could not match: making a calculus teacher cry.
Herbert Lin’s May 13 opinion essay, “The occult of the chatbot,” prompted the response by likening AI to a palm reader that reflects back only what users give it.
The writer said that gap is most visible to trained writers rather than engineers, framing the issue as one of judgment and revision rather than raw text generation.
The piece appeared in a Washington Post readers’ forum that also touched on the Iran war and Kash Patel, placing the AI critique within a broader opinion roundup.

How will the 'first AI war' in Iran shape the future rules and ethics of autonomous military engagement?

Is the high cost of both AI development and AI-driven warfare creating a new, unsustainable technological bubble?

Can superior military tech defeat an asymmetric strategy that cripples the global economy by controlling a vital waterway?